mirror of
https://github.com/BobTheBlinker/android_kernel_motorola_sm6375.git
synced 2026-10-29 03:01:39 -04:00
[PATCH] writeback: fix range handling
When a writeback_control's `start' and `end' fields are used to
indicate a one-byte-range starting at file offset zero, the required
values of .start=0,.end=0 mean that the ->writepages() implementation
has no way of telling that it is being asked to perform a range
request. Because we're currently overloading (start == 0 && end == 0)
to mean "this is not a write-a-range request".
To make all this sane, the patch changes range of writeback_control.
So caller does: If it is calling ->writepages() to write pages, it
sets range (range_start/end or range_cyclic) always.
And if range_cyclic is true, ->writepages() thinks the range is
cyclic, otherwise it just uses range_start and range_end.
This patch does,
- Add LLONG_MAX, LLONG_MIN, ULLONG_MAX to include/linux/kernel.h
-1 is usually ok for range_end (type is long long). But, if someone did,
range_end += val; range_end is "val - 1"
u64val = range_end >> bits; u64val is "~(0ULL)"
or something, they are wrong. So, this adds LLONG_MAX to avoid nasty
things, and uses LLONG_MAX for range_end.
- All callers of ->writepages() sets range_start/end or range_cyclic.
- Fix updates of ->writeback_index. It seems already bit strange.
If it starts at 0 and ended by check of nr_to_write, this last
index may reduce chance to scan end of file. So, this updates
->writeback_index only if range_cyclic is true or whole-file is
scanned.
Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>
Cc: Nathan Scott <[email protected]>
Cc: Anton Altaparmakov <[email protected]>
Cc: Steven French <[email protected]>
Cc: "Vladimir V. Saveliev" <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4c91c3648c
commit
111ebb6e6f
9 changed files with 40 additions and 31 deletions
|
|
@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping)
|
|||
.sync_mode = WB_SYNC_NONE,
|
||||
.older_than_this = NULL,
|
||||
.nr_to_write = write_chunk,
|
||||
.range_cyclic = 1,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
get_dirty_limits(&wbs, &background_thresh,
|
||||
|
|
@ -331,6 +332,7 @@ static void background_writeout(unsigned long _min_pages)
|
|||
.older_than_this = NULL,
|
||||
.nr_to_write = 0,
|
||||
.nonblocking = 1,
|
||||
.range_cyclic = 1,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
for ( ; ; ) {
|
||||
|
|
@ -407,6 +409,7 @@ static void wb_kupdate(unsigned long arg)
|
|||
.nr_to_write = 0,
|
||||
.nonblocking = 1,
|
||||
.for_kupdate = 1,
|
||||
.range_cyclic = 1,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
sync_supers();
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue