A-Team_Digital_Solutions/android_kernel_motorola_sm6375
Watch
2
0
Fork
You've already forked android_kernel_motorola_sm6375
 0
mirror of https://github.com/BobTheBlinker/android_kernel_motorola_sm6375.git synced 2026-10-30 19:51:31 -04:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

locks: don't call ->copy_lock methods on return of conflicting locks

Browse source 
The file_lock structure is used both as a heavy-weight representation of
an active lock, with pointers to reference-counted structures, etc., and
as a simple container for parameters that describe a file lock.

The conflicting lock returned from __posix_lock_file is an example of
the latter; so don't call the filesystem or lock manager callbacks when
copying to it.  This also saves the need for an unnecessary
locks_init_lock in the nfsv4 server.

Thanks to Trond for pointing out the error.

Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <[email protected]>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
J. Bruce Fields 2008-04-24 10:08:22 -04:00
commit 1a747ee0cc
4 changed files with 4 additions and 6 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
fs/locks.c
View file

@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static void locks_copy_private(struct file_lock *new, struct file_lock *fl)
/*
* Initialize a new lock from an existing file_lock structure.
*/
static void __locks_copy_lock(struct file_lock *new, const struct file_lock *fl)
void __locks_copy_lock(struct file_lock *new, const struct file_lock *fl)
{
new->fl_owner = fl->fl_owner;
new->fl_pid = fl->fl_pid;
@ -833,7 +833,7 @@ static int __posix_lock_file(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request, str
if (!posix_locks_conflict(request, fl))
continue;
if (conflock)
locks_copy_lock(conflock, fl);
__locks_copy_lock(conflock, fl);
error = -EAGAIN;
if (!(request->fl_flags & FL_SLEEP))
goto out;