A-Team_Digital_Solutions/android_kernel_motorola_sm6375
Watch
2
0
Fork
You've already forked android_kernel_motorola_sm6375
 0
mirror of https://github.com/BobTheBlinker/android_kernel_motorola_sm6375.git synced 2026-10-29 19:21:31 -04:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

Fix common misspellings

Browse source 
Fixes generated by 'codespell' and manually reviewed.

Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
Lucas De Marchi 2011-03-30 22:57:33 -03:00
commit 25985edced
2463 changed files with 4252 additions and 4252 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
View file

@ -894,7 +894,7 @@ static int build_spdinfo(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net *net,
u32 *f;
nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, pid, seq, XFRM_MSG_NEWSPDINFO, sizeof(u32), 0);
if (nlh == NULL) /* shouldnt really happen ... */
if (nlh == NULL) /* shouldn't really happen ... */
return -EMSGSIZE;
f = nlmsg_data(nlh);
@ -954,7 +954,7 @@ static int build_sadinfo(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net *net,
u32 *f;
nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, pid, seq, XFRM_MSG_NEWSADINFO, sizeof(u32), 0);
if (nlh == NULL) /* shouldnt really happen ... */
if (nlh == NULL) /* shouldn't really happen ... */
return -EMSGSIZE;
f = nlmsg_data(nlh);
@ -1361,7 +1361,7 @@ static int xfrm_add_policy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
if (!xp)
return err;
/* shouldnt excl be based on nlh flags??
/* shouldn't excl be based on nlh flags??
* Aha! this is anti-netlink really i.e more pfkey derived
* in netlink excl is a flag and you wouldnt need
* a type XFRM_MSG_UPDPOLICY - JHS */