gpio: mcp23s08: rename the device tree property

The device tree property should be more descriptive.
microchip seems more reasonable than mcp. The old mcp
prefix is still supported but marked as deprecated.
Users of mcp have to switch to the microchip prefix.

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lars Poeschel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
Lars Poeschel 2013-08-28 10:38:50 +02:00 • committed by Linus Walleij
commit 4597168696
2 changed files with 52 additions and 15 deletions

View file

@ -483,10 +483,21 @@ fail:
#ifdef CONFIG_SPI_MASTER
static struct of_device_id mcp23s08_spi_of_match[] = {
{
.compatible = "mcp,mcp23s08", .data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_S08,
.compatible = "microchip,mcp23s08",
.data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_S08,
},
{
.compatible = "mcp,mcp23s17", .data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_S17,
.compatible = "microchip,mcp23s17",
.data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_S17,
},
/* NOTE: The use of the mcp prefix is deprecated and will be removed. */
{
.compatible = "mcp,mcp23s08",
.data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_S08,
},
{
.compatible = "mcp,mcp23s17",
.data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_S17,
},
{ },
};
@ -496,10 +507,21 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mcp23s08_spi_of_match);
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C)
static struct of_device_id mcp23s08_i2c_of_match[] = {
{
.compatible = "mcp,mcp23008", .data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_008,
.compatible = "microchip,mcp23008",
.data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_008,
},
{
.compatible = "mcp,mcp23017", .data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_017,
.compatible = "microchip,mcp23017",
.data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_017,
},
/* NOTE: The use of the mcp prefix is deprecated and will be removed. */
{
.compatible = "mcp,mcp23008",
.data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_008,
},
{
.compatible = "mcp,mcp23017",
.data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_017,
},
{ },
};
@ -620,10 +642,15 @@ static int mcp23s08_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
if (match) {
type = (int)match->data;
status = of_property_read_u32(spi->dev.of_node,
"mcp,spi-present-mask", &spi_present_mask);
"microchip,spi-present-mask", &spi_present_mask);
if (status) {
dev_err(&spi->dev, "DT has no spi-present-mask\n");
return -ENODEV;
status = of_property_read_u32(spi->dev.of_node,
"mcp,spi-present-mask", &spi_present_mask);
if (status) {
dev_err(&spi->dev,
"DT has no spi-present-mask\n");
return -ENODEV;
}
}
if ((spi_present_mask <= 0) || (spi_present_mask >= 256)) {
dev_err(&spi->dev, "invalid spi-present-mask\n");