tick-common: Fix wrong check in tick_check_replacement()

tick_check_replacement() returns if a replacement of clock_event_device is
possible or not. It does this as the first check:

	if (tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id()))
		return false;

Thats wrong. tick_check_percpu() returns true when the device is
useable. Check for false instead.

[ tglx: Massaged changelog ]

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]> # v3.11+
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/486a02efe0246635aaba786e24b42d316438bf3b.1397537987.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
Viresh Kumar 2014-04-15 10:54:37 +05:30 • committed by Thomas Gleixner
commit 521c42990e

View file

@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ static bool tick_check_preferred(struct clock_event_device *curdev,
bool tick_check_replacement(struct clock_event_device *curdev,
struct clock_event_device *newdev)
{
if (tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id()))
if (!tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id()))
return false;
return tick_check_preferred(curdev, newdev);