A-Team_Digital_Solutions/android_kernel_motorola_sm6375
Watch
2
0
Fork
You've already forked android_kernel_motorola_sm6375
 0
mirror of https://github.com/BobTheBlinker/android_kernel_motorola_sm6375.git synced 2026-10-29 03:01:39 -04:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

[PATCH] s390: in_interrupt vs. in_atomic

Browse source 
The condition for no context in do_exception checks for hard and soft
interrupts by using in_interrupt() but not for preemption.  This is bad for
the users of __copy_from/to_user_inatomic because the fault handler might call
schedule although the preemption count is != 0.  Use in_atomic() instead
in_interrupt().

Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
Martin Schwidefsky 2005-06-04 15:43:32 -07:00 • committed by Linus Torvalds
commit 595bf2aaca
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
arch/s390/mm/fault.c
View file

@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ do_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, int is_protection)
* we are not in an interrupt and that there is a
* user context.
*/
if (user_address == 0 || in_interrupt() || !mm)
if (user_address == 0 || in_atomic() || !mm)
goto no_context;
/*