A-Team_Digital_Solutions/android_kernel_motorola_sm6375
Watch
2
0
Fork
You've already forked android_kernel_motorola_sm6375
 0
mirror of https://github.com/BobTheBlinker/android_kernel_motorola_sm6375.git synced 2026-10-30 03:27:44 -04:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

cpufreq: remove redundant CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier event

Browse source 
What's being done from CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE, can also be done with
CPUFREQ_ADJUST. There is nothing special with CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE
notifier.

Kill CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE and fix its usage sites.

This also updates the numbering of notifier events to remove holes.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
Viresh Kumar 2015-08-03 08:36:14 +05:30 • committed by Rafael J. Wysocki
commit 6bfb7c7434
7 changed files with 9 additions and 19 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
View file

@ -2206,10 +2206,6 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
CPUFREQ_ADJUST, new_policy);
/* adjust if necessary - hardware incompatibility*/
blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE, new_policy);
/*
* verify the cpu speed can be set within this limit, which might be
* different to the first one

4
drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c
View file

@ -97,8 +97,8 @@ static int pmi_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *cbe_freqs;
u8 node;
/* Should this really be called for CPUFREQ_ADJUST, CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE
* and CPUFREQ_NOTIFY policy events?)
/* Should this really be called for CPUFREQ_ADJUST and CPUFREQ_NOTIFY
* policy events?)
*/
if (event == CPUFREQ_START)
return 0;