A-Team_Digital_Solutions/android_kernel_motorola_sm6375
Watch
2
0
Fork
You've already forked android_kernel_motorola_sm6375
 0
mirror of https://github.com/BobTheBlinker/android_kernel_motorola_sm6375.git synced 2026-10-30 11:41:38 -04:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

ksm: fix conflict between mmput and scan_get_next_rmap_item

Browse source 
A concurrency issue about KSM in the function scan_get_next_rmap_item.

task A (ksmd):				|task B (the mm's task):
					|
mm = slot->mm;				|
down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);		|
					|
...					|
					|
spin_lock(&ksm_mmlist_lock);		|
					|
ksm_scan.mm_slot go to the next slot;	|
					|
spin_unlock(&ksm_mmlist_lock);		|
					|mmput() ->
					|	ksm_exit():
					|
					|spin_lock(&ksm_mmlist_lock);
					|if (mm_slot && ksm_scan.mm_slot != mm_slot) {
					|	if (!mm_slot->rmap_list) {
					|		easy_to_free = 1;
					|		...
					|
					|if (easy_to_free) {
					|	mmdrop(mm);
					|	...
					|
					|So this mm_struct may be freed in the mmput().
					|
up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);			|

As we can see above, the ksmd thread may access a mm_struct that already
been freed to the kmem_cache.  Suppose a fork will get this mm_struct from
the kmem_cache, the ksmd thread then call up_read(&mm->mmap_sem), will
cause mmap_sem.count to become -1.

As suggested by Andrea Arcangeli, unmerge_and_remove_all_rmap_items has
the same SMP race condition, so fix it too.  My prev fix in function
scan_get_next_rmap_item will introduce a different SMP race condition, so
just invert the up_read/spin_unlock order as Andrea Arcangeli said.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Zhou Chengming <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <[email protected]>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
Cc: Geliang Tang <[email protected]>
Cc: Minchan Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <[email protected]>
Cc: Ding Tianhong <[email protected]>
Cc: Li Bin <[email protected]>
Cc: Zhen Lei <[email protected]>
Cc: Xishi Qiu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
Zhou Chengming 2016-05-12 15:42:21 -07:00 • committed by Linus Torvalds
commit 7496fea9a6
1 changed files with 10 additions and 5 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

15
mm/ksm.c
View file

@ -783,6 +783,7 @@ static int unmerge_and_remove_all_rmap_items(void)
}
remove_trailing_rmap_items(mm_slot, &mm_slot->rmap_list);
up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
spin_lock(&ksm_mmlist_lock);
ksm_scan.mm_slot = list_entry(mm_slot->mm_list.next,
@ -794,12 +795,9 @@ static int unmerge_and_remove_all_rmap_items(void)
free_mm_slot(mm_slot);
clear_bit(MMF_VM_MERGEABLE, &mm->flags);
up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
mmdrop(mm);
} else {
} else
spin_unlock(&ksm_mmlist_lock);
up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
}
}
/* Clean up stable nodes, but don't worry if some are still busy */
@ -1663,8 +1661,15 @@ next_mm:
up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
mmdrop(mm);
} else {
spin_unlock(&ksm_mmlist_lock);
up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
/*
* up_read(&mm->mmap_sem) first because after
* spin_unlock(&ksm_mmlist_lock) run, the "mm" may
* already have been freed under us by __ksm_exit()
* because the "mm_slot" is still hashed and
* ksm_scan.mm_slot doesn't point to it anymore.
*/
spin_unlock(&ksm_mmlist_lock);
}
/* Repeat until we've completed scanning the whole list */