uprobes: Reintroduce uprobe_consumer->filter()

Finally add uprobe_consumer->filter() and change consumer_filter()
to actually call this method.

Note that ->filter() accepts mm_struct, not task_struct. Because:

	1. We do not have for_each_mm_user(mm, task).

	2. Even if we implement for_each_mm_user(), ->filter() can
	   use it itself.

	3. It is not clear who will actually need this interface to
	   do the "nontrivial" filtering.

Another argument is "enum uprobe_filter_ctx", consumer->filter() can
use it to figure out why/where it was called. For example, perhaps
we can add UPROBE_FILTER_PRE_REGISTER used by build_map_info() to
quickly "nack" the unwanted mm's. In this case consumer should know
that it is called under ->i_mmap_mutex.

See the previous discussion at http://marc.info/?t=135214229700002
Perhaps we should pass more arguments, vma/vaddr?

Note: this patch obviously can't help to filter out the child created
by fork(), this will be addressed later.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

include/linux/uprobes.h

@@ -35,8 +35,17 @@ struct inode;
 # include <asm/uprobes.h>
 #endif
 
+enum uprobe_filter_ctx {
+	UPROBE_FILTER_REGISTER,
+	UPROBE_FILTER_UNREGISTER,
+	UPROBE_FILTER_MMAP,
+};
+
 struct uprobe_consumer {
 	int (*handler)(struct uprobe_consumer *self, struct pt_regs *regs);
+	bool (*filter)(struct uprobe_consumer *self,
+				enum uprobe_filter_ctx ctx,
+				struct mm_struct *mm);
 
 	struct uprobe_consumer *next;
 };