mirror of
https://github.com/BobTheBlinker/android_kernel_motorola_sm6375.git
synced 2026-10-29 11:11:45 -04:00
sched/fair: Search a task from the tail of the queue
As a first step this patch makes cfs_tasks list as MRU one. It means, that when a next task is picked to run on physical CPU it is moved to the front of the list. Therefore, the cfs_tasks list is more or less sorted (except woken tasks) starting from recently given CPU time tasks toward tasks with max wait time in a run-queue, i.e. MRU list. Second, as part of the load balance operation, this approach starts detach_tasks()/detach_one_task() from the tail of the queue instead of the head, giving some advantages: - tends to pick a task with highest wait time; - tasks located in the tail are less likely cache-hot, therefore the can_migrate_task() decision is higher. hackbench illustrates slightly better performance. For example doing 1000 samples and 40 groups on i5-3320M CPU, it shows below figures: default: 0.657 avg patched: 0.646 avg Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Cc: Kirill Tkhai <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]> Cc: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Oleksiy Avramchenko <[email protected]> Cc: Paul Turner <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Tim Chen <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
parent
051f3ca02e
commit
93824900a2
1 changed files with 16 additions and 8 deletions
|
|
@ -6628,10 +6628,7 @@ again:
|
|||
set_next_entity(cfs_rq, se);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (hrtick_enabled(rq))
|
||||
hrtick_start_fair(rq, p);
|
||||
|
||||
return p;
|
||||
goto done;
|
||||
simple:
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -6645,6 +6642,16 @@ simple:
|
|||
|
||||
p = task_of(se);
|
||||
|
||||
done: __maybe_unused
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Move the next running task to the front of
|
||||
* the list, so our cfs_tasks list becomes MRU
|
||||
* one.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
list_move(&p->se.group_node, &rq->cfs_tasks);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
if (hrtick_enabled(rq))
|
||||
hrtick_start_fair(rq, p);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -7080,11 +7087,12 @@ static void detach_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
|
|||
*/
|
||||
static struct task_struct *detach_one_task(struct lb_env *env)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct task_struct *p, *n;
|
||||
struct task_struct *p;
|
||||
|
||||
lockdep_assert_held(&env->src_rq->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &env->src_rq->cfs_tasks, se.group_node) {
|
||||
list_for_each_entry_reverse(p,
|
||||
&env->src_rq->cfs_tasks, se.group_node) {
|
||||
if (!can_migrate_task(p, env))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -7130,7 +7138,7 @@ static int detach_tasks(struct lb_env *env)
|
|||
if (env->idle != CPU_NOT_IDLE && env->src_rq->nr_running <= 1)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
p = list_first_entry(tasks, struct task_struct, se.group_node);
|
||||
p = list_last_entry(tasks, struct task_struct, se.group_node);
|
||||
|
||||
env->loop++;
|
||||
/* We've more or less seen every task there is, call it quits */
|
||||
|
|
@ -7180,7 +7188,7 @@ static int detach_tasks(struct lb_env *env)
|
|||
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
next:
|
||||
list_move_tail(&p->se.group_node, tasks);
|
||||
list_move(&p->se.group_node, tasks);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue