A-Team_Digital_Solutions/android_kernel_motorola_sm6375
Watch
2
0
Fork
You've already forked android_kernel_motorola_sm6375
 0
mirror of https://github.com/BobTheBlinker/android_kernel_motorola_sm6375.git synced 2026-10-29 19:21:31 -04:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

proc 2/2: remove struct proc_dir_entry::owner

Browse source 
Setting ->owner as done currently (pde->owner = THIS_MODULE) is racy
as correctly noted at bug #12454. Someone can lookup entry with NULL
->owner, thus not pinning enything, and release it later resulting
in module refcount underflow.

We can keep ->owner and supply it at registration time like ->proc_fops
and ->data.

But this leaves ->owner as easy-manipulative field (just one C assignment)
and somebody will forget to unpin previous/pin current module when
switching ->owner. ->proc_fops is declared as "const" which should give
some thoughts.

->read_proc/->write_proc were just fixed to not require ->owner for
protection.

rmmod'ed directories will be empty and return "." and ".." -- no harm.
And directories with tricky enough readdir and lookup shouldn't be modular.
We definitely don't want such modular code.

Removing ->owner will also make PDE smaller.

So, let's nuke it.

Kudos to Jeff Layton for reminding about this, let's say, oversight.

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
Alexey Dobriyan 2009-03-25 22:48:06 +03:00
commit 99b7623380
55 changed files with 26 additions and 232 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

9
Documentation/DocBook/procfs_example.c
View file

@ -117,9 +117,6 @@ static int __init init_procfs_example(void)
rv = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
example_dir->owner = THIS_MODULE;
/* create jiffies using convenience function */
jiffies_file = create_proc_read_entry("jiffies",
0444, example_dir,
@ -130,8 +127,6 @@ static int __init init_procfs_example(void)
goto no_jiffies;
}
jiffies_file->owner = THIS_MODULE;
/* create foo and bar files using same callback
* functions
*/
@ -146,7 +141,6 @@ static int __init init_procfs_example(void)
foo_file->data = &foo_data;
foo_file->read_proc = proc_read_foobar;
foo_file->write_proc = proc_write_foobar;
foo_file->owner = THIS_MODULE;
bar_file = create_proc_entry("bar", 0644, example_dir);
if(bar_file == NULL) {
@ -159,7 +153,6 @@ static int __init init_procfs_example(void)
bar_file->data = &bar_data;
bar_file->read_proc = proc_read_foobar;
bar_file->write_proc = proc_write_foobar;
bar_file->owner = THIS_MODULE;
/* create symlink */
symlink = proc_symlink("jiffies_too", example_dir,
@ -169,8 +162,6 @@ static int __init init_procfs_example(void)
goto no_symlink;
}
symlink->owner = THIS_MODULE;
/* everything OK */
printk(KERN_INFO "%s %s initialised\n",
MODULE_NAME, MODULE_VERS);