A-Team_Digital_Solutions/android_kernel_motorola_sm6375
Watch
2
0
Fork
You've already forked android_kernel_motorola_sm6375
 0
mirror of https://github.com/BobTheBlinker/android_kernel_motorola_sm6375.git synced 2026-10-10 14:19:09 -04:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

UPSTREAM: sched/rt: Re-instate old behavior in select_task_rq_rt()

Browse source 
When RT Capacity Aware support was added, the logic in select_task_rq_rt
was modified to force a search for a fitting CPU if the task currently
doesn't run on one.

But if the search failed, and the search was only triggered to fulfill
the fitness request; we could end up selecting a new CPU unnecessarily.

Fix this and re-instate the original behavior by ensuring we bail out
in that case.

This behavior change only affected asymmetric systems that are using
util_clamp to implement capacity aware. None asymmetric systems weren't
affected.

Bug: 120440300
LINK: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200218041620.GD28029@codeaurora.org/
Reported-by: Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Fixes: 804d402fb6f6 ("sched/rt: Make RT capacity-aware")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200302132721.8353-3-qais.yousef@arm.com
(cherry picked from commit b28bc1e002c23ff8a4999c4a2fb1d4d412bc6f5e)
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Change-Id: Ie3e9e56fcf7d92a1552828b20a5d9d827c030099
This commit is contained in:
Qais Yousef 2020-03-02 13:27:17 +00:00
commit a3b3fe50f5
1 changed files with 9 additions and 0 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

9
kernel/sched/rt.c
View file

@ -1474,6 +1474,13 @@ select_task_rq_rt(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int sd_flag, int flags)
if (test || !rt_task_fits_capacity(p, cpu)) {
int target = find_lowest_rq(p);
/*
* Bail out if we were forcing a migration to find a better
* fitting CPU but our search failed.
*/
if (!test && target != -1 && !rt_task_fits_capacity(p, target))
goto out_unlock;
/*
* Don't bother moving it if the destination CPU is
* not running a lower priority task.
@ -1482,6 +1489,8 @@ select_task_rq_rt(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int sd_flag, int flags)
p->prio < cpu_rq(target)->rt.highest_prio.curr)
cpu = target;
}
out_unlock:
rcu_read_unlock();
out: