Merge branches 'release', 'ejd', 'sony' and 'wmi' into release

This commit is contained in:
Len Brown 2008-03-13 01:59:52 -04:00
6 changed files with 40 additions and 18 deletions

View file

@ -609,7 +609,8 @@ acpi_bus_get_ejd(acpi_handle handle, acpi_handle *ejd)
status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_EJD", NULL, &buffer);
if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
obj = buffer.pointer;
status = acpi_get_handle(NULL, obj->string.pointer, ejd);
status = acpi_get_handle(ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT, obj->string.pointer,
ejd);
kfree(buffer.pointer);
}
return status;

View file

@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ struct acpi_buffer *out)
{
struct guid_block *block = NULL;
struct wmi_block *wblock = NULL;
acpi_handle handle;
acpi_handle handle, wc_handle;
acpi_status status, wc_status = AE_ERROR;
struct acpi_object_list input, wc_input;
union acpi_object wc_params[1], wq_params[1];
@ -338,8 +338,10 @@ struct acpi_buffer *out)
* expensive, but have no corresponding WCxx method. So we
* should not fail if this happens.
*/
wc_status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, wc_method,
&wc_input, NULL);
wc_status = acpi_get_handle(handle, wc_method, &wc_handle);
if (ACPI_SUCCESS(wc_status))
wc_status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, wc_method,
&wc_input, NULL);
}
strcpy(method, "WQ");
@ -351,7 +353,7 @@ struct acpi_buffer *out)
* If ACPI_WMI_EXPENSIVE, call the relevant WCxx method, even if
* the WQxx method failed - we should disable collection anyway.
*/
if ((block->flags & ACPI_WMI_EXPENSIVE) && wc_status) {
if ((block->flags & ACPI_WMI_EXPENSIVE) && ACPI_SUCCESS(wc_status)) {
wc_params[0].integer.value = 0;
status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle,
wc_method, &wc_input, NULL);