mirror of
https://github.com/BobTheBlinker/android_kernel_motorola_sm6375.git
synced 2026-10-05 19:31:57 -04:00
BACKPORT: bpf, libbpf: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array
members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in
which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to
zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding
some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also
help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues.
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Change-Id: I612683a3eca9c84d9c48747ec3015480f64a9fb2
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200507185057.GA13981@embeddedor
This commit is contained in:
parent
a394f52c7e
commit
b8edcdb10f
3 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
|
|
@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ struct bpf_queue_stack {
|
|||
u32 head, tail;
|
||||
u32 size; /* max_entries + 1 */
|
||||
|
||||
char elements[0] __aligned(8);
|
||||
char elements[] __aligned(8);
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static struct bpf_queue_stack *bpf_queue_stack(struct bpf_map *map)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5593,7 +5593,7 @@ error:
|
|||
struct perf_sample_raw {
|
||||
struct perf_event_header header;
|
||||
uint32_t size;
|
||||
char data[0];
|
||||
char data[];
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct perf_sample_lost {
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ struct btf_ext_info_sec {
|
|||
__u32 sec_name_off;
|
||||
__u32 num_info;
|
||||
/* Followed by num_info * record_size number of bytes */
|
||||
__u8 data[0];
|
||||
__u8 data[];
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/* The minimum bpf_func_info checked by the loader */
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue