uprobes: Optimize is_swbp_at_addr() for current->mm

Change is_swbp_at_addr() to try to avoid the costly
read_opcode() if mm == current->mm, __copy_from_user_inatomic()
should succeed in the likely case.

Currently this optimization is not important, but we are going
to add more is_swbp_at_addr(current->mm) callers.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <[email protected]>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <[email protected]>
Cc: Anton Arapov <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
Oleg Nesterov 2012-05-29 21:27:44 +02:00 • committed by Ingo Molnar
commit c00b275043

View file

@ -333,10 +333,20 @@ static int is_swbp_at_addr(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr)
uprobe_opcode_t opcode;
int result;
if (current->mm == mm) {
pagefault_disable();
result = __copy_from_user_inatomic(&opcode, (void __user*)vaddr,
sizeof(opcode));
pagefault_enable();
if (likely(result == 0))
goto out;
}
result = read_opcode(mm, vaddr, &opcode);
if (result)
return result;
out:
if (is_swbp_insn(&opcode))
return 1;