mirror of
https://github.com/BobTheBlinker/android_kernel_motorola_sm6375.git
synced 2026-10-29 11:11:45 -04:00
pwm: Check for negative duty-cycle and period
Make sure the duty-cycle and period passed in are not negative. This should eventually be made implicit by making them unsigned. While at it, the drivers' .config() implementations can have the equivalent checks removed. Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]> Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Brown <[email protected]> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Cc: Sachin Kamat <[email protected]> Cc: Axel Lin <[email protected]> Cc: Kukjin Kim <[email protected]> Cc: Jingoo Han <[email protected]> Cc: Jonghwan Choi <[email protected]> Cc: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]> Cc: "Philip, Avinash" <[email protected]> Cc: Vaibhav Bedia <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jingoo Han <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f6b8a57000
commit
c2d476a98f
6 changed files with 3 additions and 12 deletions
|
|
@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_free);
|
|||
*/
|
||||
int pwm_config(struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!pwm || period_ns == 0 || duty_ns > period_ns)
|
||||
if (!pwm || duty_ns < 0 || period_ns <= 0 || duty_ns > period_ns)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
return pwm->chip->ops->config(pwm->chip, pwm, duty_ns, period_ns);
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -69,9 +69,6 @@ static int bfin_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
|
|||
unsigned long period, duty;
|
||||
unsigned long long val;
|
||||
|
||||
if (duty_ns < 0 || duty_ns > period_ns)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
val = (unsigned long long)get_sclk() * period_ns;
|
||||
do_div(val, NSEC_PER_SEC);
|
||||
period = val;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -70,9 +70,6 @@ static int pxa_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
|
|||
unsigned long offset;
|
||||
int rc;
|
||||
|
||||
if (period_ns == 0 || duty_ns > period_ns)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
offset = pwm->hwpwm ? 0x10 : 0;
|
||||
|
||||
c = clk_get_rate(pc->clk);
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -126,9 +126,6 @@ static int s3c_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
|
|||
if (period_ns > NS_IN_HZ || duty_ns > NS_IN_HZ)
|
||||
return -ERANGE;
|
||||
|
||||
if (duty_ns > period_ns)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
if (period_ns == s3c->period_ns &&
|
||||
duty_ns == s3c->duty_ns)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static int ecap_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
|
|||
unsigned long period_cycles, duty_cycles;
|
||||
unsigned int reg_val;
|
||||
|
||||
if (period_ns < 0 || duty_ns < 0 || period_ns > NSEC_PER_SEC)
|
||||
if (period_ns > NSEC_PER_SEC)
|
||||
return -ERANGE;
|
||||
|
||||
c = pc->clk_rate;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static int ehrpwm_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
|
|||
unsigned short ps_divval, tb_divval;
|
||||
int i, cmp_reg;
|
||||
|
||||
if (period_ns < 0 || duty_ns < 0 || period_ns > NSEC_PER_SEC)
|
||||
if (period_ns > NSEC_PER_SEC)
|
||||
return -ERANGE;
|
||||
|
||||
c = pc->clk_rate;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue