mirror of
https://github.com/BobTheBlinker/android_kernel_motorola_sm6375.git
synced 2026-10-29 11:11:45 -04:00
cpufreq: intel_pstate: Request P-states control from SMM if needed
Currently, intel_pstate is unable to control P-states on my IvyBridge-based Acer Aspire S5, because they are controlled by SMM on that machine by default and it is necessary to request OS control of P-states from it via the SMI Command register exposed in the ACPI FADT. intel_pstate doesn't do that now, but acpi-cpufreq and other cpufreq drivers for x86 platforms do. Address this problem by making intel_pstate use the ACPI-defined mechanism as well. However, intel_pstate is not modular and it doesn't need the module refcount tricks played by acpi_processor_notify_smm(), so export the core of this function to it as acpi_processor_pstate_control() and make it call that. [The changes in processor_perflib.c related to this should not make any functional difference for the acpi_processor_notify_smm() users]. To be safe, only call acpi_processor_notify_smm() from intel_pstate if ACPI _PPC support is enabled in it. Suggested-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f0da898b46
commit
d0ea59e188
3 changed files with 42 additions and 17 deletions
|
|
@ -249,6 +249,7 @@ extern int acpi_processor_register_performance(struct acpi_processor_performance
|
|||
*performance, unsigned int cpu);
|
||||
extern void acpi_processor_unregister_performance(unsigned int cpu);
|
||||
|
||||
int acpi_processor_pstate_control(void);
|
||||
/* note: this locks both the calling module and the processor module
|
||||
if a _PPC object exists, rmmod is disallowed then */
|
||||
int acpi_processor_notify_smm(struct module *calling_module);
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue