A-Team_Digital_Solutions/android_kernel_motorola_sm6375
Watch
2
0
Fork
You've already forked android_kernel_motorola_sm6375
 0
mirror of https://github.com/BobTheBlinker/android_kernel_motorola_sm6375.git synced 2026-10-29 11:11:45 -04:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

[PATCH] pm: fix u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in cpufreq

Browse source 
Fix u32 vs pm_message_t confusion in cpufreq.

Signed-off-by: Bernard Blackham <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
Bernard Blackham 2005-07-07 17:56:42 -07:00 • committed by Linus Torvalds
commit e00d9967e3
3 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
View file

@ -869,7 +869,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_get);
* cpufreq_suspend - let the low level driver prepare for suspend
*/
static int cpufreq_suspend(struct sys_device * sysdev, u32 state)
static int cpufreq_suspend(struct sys_device * sysdev, pm_message_t pmsg)
{
int cpu = sysdev->id;
unsigned int ret = 0;
@ -897,7 +897,7 @@ static int cpufreq_suspend(struct sys_device * sysdev, u32 state)
}
if (cpufreq_driver->suspend) {
ret = cpufreq_driver->suspend(cpu_policy, state);
ret = cpufreq_driver->suspend(cpu_policy, pmsg);
if (ret) {
printk(KERN_ERR "cpufreq: suspend failed in ->suspend "
"step on CPU %u\n", cpu_policy->cpu);