A-Team_Digital_Solutions/android_kernel_motorola_sm6375
Watch
2
0
Fork
You've already forked android_kernel_motorola_sm6375
 0
mirror of https://github.com/BobTheBlinker/android_kernel_motorola_sm6375.git synced 2026-10-30 19:51:31 -04:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

[PATCH] x86-64/i386: Use common X86_PM_TIMER option and make it EMBEDDED

Browse source 
This makes x86-64 use the common X86_PM_TIMER Kconfig entry in drivers/acpi

And since PM timer is needed for correct timing on a lot of systems
now (e.g. AMD dual cores) and we often get bug reports from people
who forgot to set it make it depend on CONFIG_EMBEDDED. x86-64 had
this change before and it's a good thing.

I also fixed the description slightly to make this more clear.

Cc: [email protected]

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
Andi Kleen 2006-02-26 04:18:37 +01:00 • committed by Linus Torvalds
commit e78256b8f3
2 changed files with 3 additions and 20 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

8
drivers/acpi/Kconfig
View file

@ -285,9 +285,8 @@ config ACPI_SYSTEM
dump your ACPI DSDT table using /proc/acpi/dsdt.
config X86_PM_TIMER
bool "Power Management Timer Support"
bool "Power Management Timer Support" if EMBEDDED
depends on X86
depends on !X86_64
default y
help
The Power Management Timer is available on all ACPI-capable,
@ -298,9 +297,8 @@ config X86_PM_TIMER
voltage scaling, unlike the commonly used Time Stamp Counter
(TSC) timing source.
So, if you see messages like 'Losing too many ticks!' in the
kernel logs, and/or you are using this on a notebook which
does not yet have an HPET, you should say "Y" here.
You should nearly always say Y here because many modern
systems require this timer.
config ACPI_CONTAINER
tristate "ACPI0004,PNP0A05 and PNP0A06 Container Driver (EXPERIMENTAL)"