mirror of
https://github.com/BobTheBlinker/android_kernel_motorola_sm6375.git
synced 2026-10-06 03:45:24 -04:00
| Filename | Latest commit message | Latest commit date |
|---|---|---|
commit d90eeb8ecd227c204ab6c34a17b372bd950b7aa2 upstream.
There are no scenarios where a weak increment is invalid on binder_node.
The only possible case where it could be invalid is if the kernel
delivers BR_DECREFS to the process that owns the node, and then
increments the weak refcount again, effectively "reviving" a dead node.
However, that is not possible: when the BR_DECREFS command is delivered,
the kernel removes and frees the binder_node. The fact that you were
able to call binder_inc_node_nilocked() implies that the node is not yet
destroyed, which implies that BR_DECREFS has not been delivered to
userspace, so incrementing the weak refcount is valid.
Note that it's currently possible to trigger this condition if the owner
calls BINDER_THREAD_EXIT while node->has_weak_ref is true. This causes
BC_INCREFS on binder_ref instances to fail when they should not.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes:
|
||
| .. | ||
| binder.c | ||
| binder_alloc.c | ||
| binder_alloc.h | ||
| binder_alloc_selftest.c | ||
| binder_internal.h | ||
| binder_trace.h | ||
| binderfs.c | ||
| Kconfig | ||
| Makefile | ||