Two fixes (leak on invalid mount argument and possible deadlock on
i_size update on 32bit smp) and a fall-through warning cleanup
----------------------------------------------------------------
Gustavo A. R. Silva (1):
9p: mark expected switch fall-through
Hou Tao (1):
9p: use inode->i_lock to protect i_size_write() under 32-bit
zhengbin (1):
9p/net: fix memory leak in p9_client_create
fs/9p/v9fs_vfs.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
fs/9p/vfs_file.c | 6 +++++-
fs/9p/vfs_inode.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
fs/9p/vfs_super.c | 4 ++--
net/9p/client.c | 2 +-
net/9p/trans_xen.c | 2 +-
7 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=q3cR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag '9p-for-5.1' of git://github.com/martinetd/linux
Pull 9p updates from Dominique Martinet:
"Here is a 9p update for 5.1; there honestly hasn't been much.
Two fixes (leak on invalid mount argument and possible deadlock on
i_size update on 32bit smp) and a fall-through warning cleanup"
* tag '9p-for-5.1' of git://github.com/martinetd/linux:
9p/net: fix memory leak in p9_client_create
9p: use inode->i_lock to protect i_size_write() under 32-bit
9p: mark expected switch fall-through
db77bef53b